• Rua Carlos Gomes, 250 - CEP: 13083-855 - Campinas, SP, Brasil

  • Portuguese, Brazil
  • English
  • Spanish
Utilizar o username do domínio IGE
Utilizar a senha do domínio IGE
  • Reset your password
IG 45 anos
Unicamp

Main Menu

  • Institutional
    • Overview
    • Departments
      • DGEO
      • DGRN
      • DPCT
    • Library
      • Comission
      • Regulations
      • Team
      • Reports
      • Services
      • Links
      • Social Media
    • Contact
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Colaborators
    • Techical and Administrative Staff
    • Researchers
    • Postdocs
  • Undergraduate
    • Overview
    • Undergraduate in Geology
    • Undergraduate in Geography
    • Scholarships and Internships
    • Contact
  • Graduate
    • Overview
    • Programmes
      • Teaching and History of Earth Sciences
      • Geosciences
      • Geography
      • Science and Technology Policy
    • Regulations and Catalogues
    • Student Entities
    • Unicamp Teacher Internship Programme Grants
    • Grants
    • Disciplines
    • Special Students
    • Defenses and Qualifications
      • Schedule
      • Procedures for dissertation defences and qualifying exams
    • Repository of Theses and Dissertations
    • Contact
  • Research
    • Overview
    • Research resources
    • Support Office for Research and Extension Projects
    • Academic and scientific production
    • Research Groups
    • Contact
  • Laboratories
  • Culture and Extension
    • Overview
    • Outreach and Specialisation Degrees
    • Extension activities
    • Contact
  • Communication
    • News
    • Social Media

Shallow vs. Deep Geoethics: Moving Beyond Anthropocentric Views

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Shallow vs. Deep Geoethics: Moving Beyond Anthropocentric Views
Greco
Giovanni Frigo, Luiz Anselmo Ifanger, Roberto Greco, Helen Kopnina & Rafaela Hillerbrand
DPCT

At its inception, geoethics was envisioned as a type of professional ethics concerned with the moral implications of geoscientific research, applications, and practices. More recently, however, some scholars have proposed versions of geoethics as public and global ethics. To better understand these developments, this article considers the relationship between geoethics and environmental ethics by exploring different aspects of the human-nature relation (i.e., the moral status and role of humans in relation to the non-human world). We start by noting that the main strains of geoethical thought elaborated so far represent examples of environmental virtue ethics and defend moral weak anthropocentric positions (e.g., “ethical”, “responsible” or “enlightened” anthropocentrism). Some scholars propose that such weak anthropocentric geoethics can synthesize the different positions in environmental ethics and move beyond them toward a novel and distinct approach. We compare the meaning and the use of the term “anthropocentrism” in both environmental ethics and geoethics, stressing that although geoethics is inevitably epistemically anthropocentric (i.e., anthropogenic), it does not need to be morally anthropocentric. We consider the compatibility of non-anthropocentric stances with current geoethical theory and argue for the integration of normative non-anthropocentric accounts (e.g., ecocentric) into geoethical debates and geoscience education.

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

Address

Rua Carlos Gomes, 250
CEP: 13083-855
Campinas, SP

Directions 

22º48'48"S 47º04'09"W

Footer menu

  • Portal Feedback

Links

  • Email Unicamp
  • Sistemas e Solicitações
  • Intranet (antiga)
  • Logotipos do IG
  • Contacts

Menu do usuário

  • Log in
IG 45 anos
Unicamp

Copyright © 2025 IG, Unicamp. Todos os direitos reservados